热门站点| 世界资料网 | 专利资料网 | 世界资料网论坛
收藏本站| 设为首页| 首页

浙江省沿海船舶边防治安管理规定

作者:法律资料网 时间:2024-05-01 13:16:10  浏览:9995   来源:法律资料网
下载地址: 点击此处下载

浙江省沿海船舶边防治安管理规定

浙江省人大常委会


浙江省沿海船舶边防治安管理规定
浙江省人大常委会


(1990年9月10日浙江省第七届人民代表大会常务委员会第十八次会议通过 1990年9月11日浙江省人民代表大会常务委员会公告第二十四号公布 1990年10月1日起施行)

目 录

第一章 总 则
第二章 船舶边防治安管理
第三章 法律责任
第四章 附 则

第一章 总 则
第一条 为了加强沿海船舶的边防治安管理,维护沿海边防治安秩序,保护船员(民)生命财产安全,根据国家有关规定,制定本规定。
第二条 本规定适用于本省海域内停泊、航行、作业的各类船舶的边防治安管理,国家另有规定的除外。
第三条 本省各级公安边防机关主管本辖区沿海船舶的边防治安管理。未设公安边防机关的地方,由公安机关负责沿海船舶的边防治安管理。
交通管理部门、渔政渔港监督管理部门根据国家规定的职权,对从事客货运输的各类船舶和从事渔业生产、水产运输以及为渔业生产服务的各类船舶实施监督管理,并协助公安边防机关对上述船舶实施边防治安管理。
第四条 沿海船舶的边防治安管理,实行依靠群众、依法管理、教育与处罚相结合的原则。

第二章 船舶边防治安管理
第五条 全民所有的船舶应随船携带船舶证书和船员有效身份证件,接受公安边防机关检查。
第六条 集体或个人所有的船舶除依照国家有关规定向相应船舶主管部门领取有关证书外,应向公安边防机关申领船舶户口簿;其船员(民)应向公安边防机关申领出海船民证。
船舶主管部门依照国家有关规定不需发给有关证书的其他船舶,应向公安边防机关申领船舶户口证。
公安边防机关依照国家有关规定认为不宜发给船舶户口簿(证)、出海船民证的,可以不发给。
第七条 船舶户口簿(证)和出海船民证不得涂改、伪造、冒用、转借。
第八条 集体或个人所有的各类船舶应随船携带船舶户口簿(证)和出海船民证,接受公安边防机关检查。
第九条 集体或个人所有的各类船舶及其船员(民),应按规定接受公安边防机关的船舶户口和出海船民证年度审验。

第十条 领取船舶户口簿的船舶更新改造、买卖、出租、出借、转让、报废时,除按规定报经相应船舶主管部门批准外,应向公安边防机关办理船舶户口变更、注销手续;其船员(民)调动应向公安边防机关办理出海船民证变更、注销手续。
领取船舶户口证的船舶按规定更新改造、买卖、出租、转让、报废时,应向公安边防机关办理船舶户口变更、注销手续。

第十一条 各类船舶应按相应船舶主管部门的规定编刷船名船号,所编刷的船名船号不得擅自拆换、遮盖、涂改、伪造。
第十二条 集体或个人所有的各类船舶进出港口时,除按规定向相应船舶主管部门办理进出港签证外,应向公安边防机关办理进出港船舶户口登记,但下列情况按以下规定办理:
(一)船舶主管部门实行定期或往返签证的船舶进出港口,免予办理船舶户口登记;
(二)渔业船舶进出船籍港的,按渔汛每年办理两次船舶户口登记;
(三)渔业船舶在渔汛期间进出非船籍港的,办理一次性船舶户口登记;
(四)领取船舶户口证的船舶进出船籍港的,每年办理两次船舶户口登记。
第十三条 任何船舶或人员不得非法进入国家禁止进入的水域或岛屿。
第十四条 境内船舶不得擅自搭靠外国籍船舶、台湾船舶和香港、澳门等地区的船舶。
境内船舶因处理海上事故的需要,依照国家有关规定搭靠外国籍船舶、台湾船舶和香港、澳门等地区船舶的,事后除按规定向相应船舶主管部门报告外,应向公安边防机关报告并接受检查。
境内船舶依照国家有关规定,需要搭靠停泊在港口、锚地的外国籍船舶、台湾船舶和香港、澳门等地区船舶进行贸易等活动的,除依法办理海关、税务等有关手续外,应向公安边防机关办理登船手续并接受检查。
第十五条 台湾船舶因避风、补给、修理或贸易等需要,可以到省人民政府公布的接待港口、锚地停泊。任何船舶或个人未经许可不得将台湾船舶引航到不接待台湾船舶的港口、锚地。
第十六条 任何船舶或人员不得非法拦截、扣押、强行靠登或偷开他人船舶。
任何船舶或人员不得以任何非法方式处理渔事、海事纠纷,严禁“打砸抢”。
第十七条 任何船舶或人员不得进行抢劫、走私、贩毒、传播淫秽物品、偷渡、盗窃、赌博、卖淫以及其他违法犯罪活动。
第十八条 任何船舶或人员应服从公安边防机关及其他有关机关的管理,不得拒绝或妨碍国家工作人员执行职务。
第十九条 公安边防机关工作人员在执行职务时,必须着中国人民武装警察边防部队制式服装,佩戴执勤标志,并出示边防治安管理检查证。

第三章 法律责任
第二十条 船舶或人员有下列行为之一的,处警告、船上负责人和直接责任人500元以下罚款或扣留船舶5天以下:

(一)不按规定申领船舶户口簿(证)和出海船民证,经通知不加改正的;
(二)不按规定携带船舶户口簿(证)和出海船民证的;
(三)不按规定接受船舶户口和出海船民证年度审验,经通知不加改正的;
(四)不按规定办理船舶户口和出海船民证变更、注销手续的;
(五)船舶进出港口不按规定办理船舶户口登记的;
(六)涂改、伪造、冒用、转借船舶户口簿(证)和出海船民证的;
(七)不按规定编刷船名船号,或擅自拆换、遮盖、涂改、伪造船名船号的。
第二十一条 船舶或人员有下列行为之一的,处船上负责人和直接责任人1000元以下罚款、扣留船舶10天以下或吊销船舶户口簿(证)和出海船民证:
(一)非法进入国家禁止进入的水域或岛屿的;
(二)擅自搭靠外国籍船舶、台湾船舶和香港、澳门等地区船舶或搭靠后不按规定及时向公安边防机关报告的;
(三)未经许可将台湾船舶引航到不接待台湾船舶的港口、锚地的。
第二十二条 船舶或人员有下列行为之一的,处船上负责人和直接责任人3000元以下罚款、扣留船舶15天以下或吊销船舶户口簿(证)和出海船民证:
(一)索要、私藏、买卖、传播带有反动宣传内容的物品的;
(二)在海上强买强卖渔获物的;
(三)非法拦截、扣押、强行靠登或偷开他人船舶的。
第二十三条 本规定第二十条至第二十二条所列各种处罚,可以并处。
第二十四条 有本规定第二十一条、第二十二条行为之一,屡教不改的,经省公安边防机关裁决,可以没收违法者所有的用于违法活动的船舶。
第二十五条 对于本规定第二十条至第二十二条所列违法行为,除按规定处罚并没收违禁物品和非法所得外,还应责成当场纠正;当场无法纠正的,应责成限期纠正。在指定的纠正期限内,不受重复处罚。
第二十六条 本规定的处罚权限如下:
(一)处以警告、罚款不满500元、扣留船舶不满5天的,由公安边防派出所、海上公安巡逻艇或公安边防巡逻艇裁决;
(二)处以罚款500元以上、扣留船舶5天以上、吊销船舶户口簿(证)和出海船民证的,由县(市、区)公安边防机关或相当于县级的公安边防机关裁决。
在海上处以罚款的,罚款应当场交纳。
第二十七条 不服公安边防机关裁决的,在接到裁决书后的三十日内,可以向上一级公安边防机关申请复议,上一级公安边防机关应在接到复议申请后的两个月内作出复议决定;申请人不服复议决定或复议机关逾期不作决定的,申请人可以在接到复议决定书之日或复议期满之日起十五
日内向人民法院提起诉讼。
第二十八条 依照本规定收取的罚款和没收的财物上交国库。
第二十九条 船舶或人员有下列行为的,依照国家有关法律、法规处罚,构成犯罪的,依法追究刑事责任:
(一)非法买卖、运输、携带毒品、淫秽物品及其他走私物品的;
(二)参与或帮助他人非法出入境的;
(三)哄抢、盗窃、抢夺、抢劫渔获物、渔用物资及其他公私财物的;
(四)斗殴或非法限制他人人身自由的;
(五)拒绝、阻碍国家工作人员依法执行职务的;
(六)进行其他违法犯罪活动的。
第三十条 公安边防机关在执行职务中,发现船舶或人员有违反海上交通管理、渔政管理等行为的,有权予以制止,并移交或通知有关主管部门处理。

第四章 附 则
第三十一条 本省海域内外国籍船舶、台湾船舶和香港、澳门等地区船舶的边防治安管理,除国家另有规定外,参照本规定执行。
第三十二条 本规定的具体应用问题,由省公安厅负责解释。
第三十三条 本规定自1990年10月1日起施行。



1990年9月11日
下载地址: 点击此处下载

The Draft Constitution and Human Rights Protection in European Union

周大勇 (Zhou,Dayong)

1 the general introduction of the draft constitution in aspect of the human rights
2 short review of the human rights protection in European Union
3 the new points in aspect of human rights in the draft constitution
3.1 common values
3.2 incorporation of the Charter of fundamental rights
3.3 other changes could affect the human rights
4 arisen questions
4.1 the protection different from under the Convention
4.2 the two courts system and its application
5 conclusions in a historical view




1 general introduction of the draft constitution in aspect of the human rights

“Conscious that Europe is a continent that has brought forth civilization; That its inhabitants, arriving in successive waves from earliest times, have gradually developed the values underlying humanism: equality of persons, freedom, respect for reason” Extract from the preamble to the draft Constitution

In past 16 years, the European Union (EU hereafter) has marked itself through a series of changes. From The Single European Act, in which the Union committed itself to create a single market and at the same time establish on its territory the freedom of movement of people, goods, services as well as capital, to Maastricht Treaty, which brought the Union into reality and led to common foreign policy and cooperation in the area of justice and internal affairs as a higher level cooperation among Member States. Then the following Amsterdam (1997) and Nice (2001) Treaties, strengthened cooperation in foreign and security policy and placed Justice and Home Affairs matters and established the frame for the Union as a legitimate institution, in which people from different nations integrated in a large region would have common historical direction and splendid future before them. Just before the door of enlargement of the Union, it was argued that the Union has to improve democracy and transparency as well as efficiency, in order to outlines the EU’s purpose and competence clearly and streamline structures so as to prevent paralysis, therefore a new constitution for the Union is determined to replace the EU's series of key treaties in passed over the last 50 years as a single document .

Under leading of former French President and master draftsman Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, the European Convention set about its work of drafting the European Union's first ever full-fledged constitution. With the convention's work completed, the draft must now be finalized by an Intergovernmental Conference of European leaders that is expected to complete deliberations by the end of the 2003. As far as our topic is concerned, noticeably modifications come out in the constitution contract, first of all, the incorporation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which we will discuss later. In the beginning it is meaningful to consider the statues of the draft constitution in the progress course of the Union. The Union desires to bring peace and prosperity, to promote economic and social progress through continuously integrating market and expanding freedom under light of united institution and social systems . These goals, however, are the foundation of development and protection of human rights . That means, if we regard human rights as a series right which realized at first in peaceful and law-ruling society, then the Union has already kept on entrenching to appreciate these goal from beginning on, and now by means of perusing such goal in a larger region through enlargement, the EU’s influence extent to broader area and more people.

The draft constitution then in such context should be viewed as another historical phase in the process. Because the promoting of well-being and fortune of people depend not only on the development of economic situation and adding some single freedom clauses into the governmental documents, but also upon the entire politic system and background in which we live. Without governing based on democratic and effective institutional structure, and especially a ripe legislation and judiciary mechanism, the realization and protection of human rights could only be on the paper. This is also one of the motive caused the Declaration on the future of the European Union which committed the Union to becoming more democratic, more transparent and effective, in order to pave the way for a Constitution in response to the expectations of the people of Europe . In this perspective, one shall recognize the Constitution as a moving forward step of the whole EU institutionalization targeting its goal, so that to discuss the Constitution in connection with the human right protection, it is helpful to review the human rights protection in Europe and, especially in EU.

2 short review of the human rights protection in European Union

The protection of human rights has been internationally come to life in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 (UDHR) with reorganization of disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind and respect for inherent dignity as well as the equal rights of all members of the human. This declaration states explicitly that the rights and freedoms of humans have to be guaranteed without distinction and destruction by any group, state or person. These principles were broadly accepted by European countries, considering the origin of the EU (EC) and the historical separation in Europe after WWII, we denote only the contracting countries of European Community.

For the Member States of EC, the Council of Europe has been up to now the most important instrument, which established in 1949 as a result of the Congress of Europe in The Hague , and took for the basic of the human rights protection. The Council accepted the principles of Universal Declaration of Human Rights and integrated it into The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (the Convention hereafter), which and its 12 Protocols turned out to be the significant resource for Human Rights protection in Europe. Because of the existence of the Convention, the other two organizations established in the same age aftermath of the Second World War, i.e. OEEC and the European Communities didn’t include relevant clauses for Human Rights protection into their founding treaties. Since it was agreed at that time, the Council of Europe would focus on the protection of human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic values, whereas the OECD and the European Communities were to be concerned with the economic restoration of Europe. The reason of separate organizations was based on a view to avoiding economic excuses for future inhumanity. Another reason came from the thought, which believed that the process of economic integration set forth in the Community Treaties could not lead to a violation of human rights. Furthermore, the original Member States in the Treaty of Rome feared, that the inclusion of a "bill of rights" in the Treaty might have brought about an undesirable expansion of Community powers, since it could lead Community institutions to interpret their powers as extending to anything not explicitly prohibited by the enumerated guarantees.

Under the regime of Council of Europe, a lots of achievement of human rights improvement has been reached , yet along with the development and expansion of EU, another mechanism on protection of human rights which does not totally rely on the Council of Europe has derived out on one hand, on the other hand being lack of provisions ruling human rights protection in the Treaty establishing EC did not prevent the EC and the later European Union from providing care for the protection against the violations on human rights. Naturally, how could a swelling supranational organization as EC, which has been continually strengthening its power in all social aspects, does not involve in human rights issues especially when the consciousness of human rights nowadays become more significant both in international and national stages? Regarding to EU, The protection system has been formed in three aspects.

First of all, the legislation in the Member States of EU. Since there were no Member States of EU (EC) which accedes to the Community without being a member of the Council of Europe, and according to the Convention, it impose obligations on the Member States that they should ensure that the internal laws and practices comply with the human rights standards set out in the instruments. Very member states in EU have recognize the principles derived from the Convention and incorporated them somehow into national laws, most importantly, provided constitutive protection as the basic legal resource for human rights protection. For example in Germany, Basic Law (Grundgesetz) Art 1 to 19 deliver explicit provisions even beyond the Convention; the same case as Part VIII (§71-85) in Constitution of Denmark ; in Britain the Act of Human Rights came into force on 2 October 2000 steers extending a ways, in which the Convention can be used before domestic courts. Certainly, according to the classic human rights lessons, the basic protection of human rights could only be afforded at the national level through national legislation and excise of authoritative power.

Secondly, the institutions and legislation at the EU level acts also with high respect to the human rights protection. The EU has showed its commitment to human rights and fundamental freedoms and has explicitly confirmed the EU's attachment to fundamental social rights ever since its establishment.

The Amsterdam Treaty established procedures intended to secure their protection. It was ascertained, as a general principle, that the European Union should respect human rights and fundamental freedoms, upon which the Union is founded. For the first time a procedure is introduced, according to which severe and continuing violations of Fundamental Rights can lead to suspension of voting and other rights of a member state, if the Union determined the existence of a serious and persistent breach of these principles by that Member State. As to the Candidate countries, they should also respect these principles to join the Union. Furthermore, It has also given the European Court of Justice the power to ensure respect of fundamental rights and freedoms by the European institutions. In accordance with the inner requirement for the implementation of development cooperation operations, in order to reach objective of developing and consolidating democracy, EU also need its rule respecting for human rights. Such cases we have are for instance the EU Council’s regulation on human rights, Council Regulation (EC) No 975/199 and Council Regulation (EC) No 976/1999 for example, are aimed at providing technical and financial aid for operations to promote and protect of civil and political rights as well as economic, social and cultural rights etc.

Likewise, at their meeting in Cologne in June 1999, EU leaders declared that in respect to the current stage of progress of the European Union, the fundamental rights applicable at Union level should be pushed forward, namely be consolidated in a Charter and thereby made more evident. They argued, that the legal resources of human rights protection come from not only the European Convention of Human Right, but also from various international conventions drawn up by the Council of Europe as well as the United Nations and the International Labor Organization, they also include EU treaties themselves and from the case law of the European Court of Justice. As a result, a Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter hereinafter) was sketch out, which highlighted the EU’s respect for human rights, for fundamental freedoms and for the principle of democracy through listing more rights a more precise definition of the common values comparing the early documents including the Convention. We will continue to concentrate on the Charter in point 3 since it has been integrated in the draft Constitution as an outstanding achievement.

Finally, the opinion and case-law of European Court of Justice (ECJ hereafter) also have immense impact on the establishment of the instrument of human rights protection within EU.

Although the jurisprudence developed by the ECJ recognizes the Convention as the standard-setter in cases in which the Court has to consider and decide a human rights issue, since there were no relevant legislation existed in the frame of the Community, the ECJ furnish itself power in this aspect by means of case-law. Earlier in 1974, the ECJ first made reference to the ECHR in the Nold judgment, in which the ECJ emphasized its commitment to fundamental human rights based on the constitutional traditions of the Member States’ fundamental rights form an integral part of the general principles of law which the Court enforces. In assuring the protection of such rights, the Court is required to base itself on the constitutional traditions common to the Member States and therefore could not allow measures, which are incompatible with the fundamental rights recognized and guaranteed by the constitutions of such States. The ECJ declared, that the international treaties on the protection of human rights in which the Member States have cooperated or to which they have adhered could also supply indications which may be taken into account within the framework of Community law.

That implied, even without clear regulations in the treaties, the remedy against violation on human rights could also be provided within the framework of the Community in respect for the common traditions applied to the Member States, and in connection with we have mentioned about the Member States’ above, the principles and resource applied to the Member States derived from the Council of Europe. Thus a EU standard could be established by transform a rating comparison of the members’ legal systems to the case-law in ECJ in respect for human rights.

财政部、海关总署、国家税务总局关于第6届亚洲冬季运动会税收政策的通知

财政部、海关总署、国家税务总局


财政部、海关总署、国家税务总局关于第6届亚洲冬季运动会税收政策的通知
财税[2005]24号

各省、自治区、直辖市、计划单列市财政厅(局)、国家税务局、地方税务局、海关总署广东分署,天津、上海特派办,各直属海关:

为确保2007年初我国吉林省长春市成功举办第6届亚洲冬季运动会(以下简称亚冬会),经国务院批准,现就亚冬会组委会(以下简称亚组委)、亚奥理事会和亚冬会参与者的税收政策通知如下:

一、对外国政府和国际组织无偿捐赠用于亚冬会的进口物资,免征关税、进口环节增值税和消费税。

二、对以一般贸易方式进口,用于亚冬会体育场馆建设所需的进口设备,按现行政策规定,除《国内投资项目不予免税的进口商品目录》所列商品外,免征关税和进口环节增值税。免税进口设备范围及数量由亚组委汇总后报财政部商有关部门审核确定。

三、对亚组委为举办亚冬会进口的体育竞赛器材、设备,包括:亚奥理事会或国际单项体育组织指定的、我国国内不能生产或性能不能满足需要的体育竞赛器材、设备和比赛用消耗品,免征关税和进口环节增值税。

享受免税政策的亚冬会进口体育竞赛设备、器材及比赛用消耗品的范围、数量清单,由亚组委汇总后报财政部商有关部门审核确定。

四、对亚组委、亚奥理事会、各国际单项联合会、各亚洲单项联合会、各参赛国(地区)代表团、新闻界、赞助商与供应商直接用于亚冬会的进口设备在运动会期间按暂准进口货物规定办理,运动会结束后复运出境的予以核销;留在境内或做变卖处理的,按有关规定办理正式进口手续,并照章缴纳关税和进口环节增值税、消费税。

上述暂准进口的商品范围、数量清单,由亚组委汇总后报财政部商有关部门审核确定。

五、对亚组委、亚奥理事会、国际单项体育组织和其他社会团体等从国外邮寄进口且不流入国内市场的、直接用于亚冬会的非贸易性文件、无商业价值的广告品,在合理数量范围内免征关税和进口环节增值税。合理数量的具体标准由海关总署确定。

六、对参赛运动员因亚冬会比赛成绩获得的奖金或其他奖赏收入,按现行税收法律法规的有关规定征免个人所得税。

七、对亚组委、亚奥理事会和亚冬会参与者取得的其他收入均应照章征税。

八、本通知自发文之日起执行。各地财政、税务及海关等管理部门要密切关注上述税收优惠政策的执行情况,对发现的问题及时向财政部、海关总署和国家税务总局反映。

请遵照执行。

财政部 海关总署 国家税务总局

二○○五年三月二十二日



版权声明:所有资料均为作者提供或网友推荐收集整理而来,仅供爱好者学习和研究使用,版权归原作者所有。
如本站内容有侵犯您的合法权益,请和我们取得联系,我们将立即改正或删除。
京ICP备14017250号-1